Large language models are able to talk like hu.ans now. Any remote talking could be faked. Imposters in important offices can fool people for a while to make them do the wrong things with nukes and military and poli e.

And what does the DOJ do with people doing unlawful behavior these days? Test for who it is first? Kick the can down the road when it's the better sort of people doing unlawful behavior?

Deepmind made all the alphago, etc models. I can't believe Google still wont let people use it, like chatalpha kind of thing. Google sits on everything, does damn little with their creations.

Nobody complains about the lack of waterproofing of an unfinished roof on a house. Millions are at risk, so let's put a pause on that!

No, it asked for the NLP models that are successors to gpt4 to be paused. Not all AI, not gpt4.

Prices have gone down for cars. You're remembering the past, not looking at current.

Go wstch YouTube for pinecone.ai and milvus. Also, go watch office365 copilot video.

What if we didn't pay for rent and groceries?

I did the game with it.it worked great.

Sandy Hook, then Bradley Beach!

What is the max fill on a cable tray?

The maximum fill capacity for cable trays depends on the type of cables being used and the specific requirements outlined in the National Electrical Code (NEC) for safe cable installation. According to NEC Article 392.9(B), the fill area in cable trays must not exceed the following percentages:

For power cables or a combination of power and control cables: a. 50% fill for single conductor cables rated 600 volts or less. b. 40% fill for single conductor cables rated above 600 volts. c. 50% fill for multiconductor cables rated 600 volts or less. d. 40% fill for multiconductor cables rated above 600 volts.

For control, signal, and communication cables: a. 50% fill for all types of cables.

It's essential to adhere to these maximum fill percentages to ensure proper heat dissipation, prevent overheating, and maintain the integrity of the cable insulation. Overfilling cable trays can lead to derating of the cable ampacity, increased risk of fire, and reduced cable lifespan.

Remember to consult the latest version of the NEC and any local codes or amendments that may be in place to ensure compliance with all applicable regulations.

Summarize in 200 words max what you know about electrician code NEC and give 3 examples afterwards.

The National Electrical Code (NEC), also known as NFPA 70, is a comprehensive set of standards and guidelines for the safe installation and maintenance of electrical systems in the United States. Developed by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), the NEC covers various aspects of electrical work, including wiring, grounding, and equipment installation. The code is revised every three years to keep up with technological advancements and ensure the highest safety standards.

The NEC serves as a benchmark for electrical work and is adopted by most states and local jurisdictions. It provides essential information and best practices to ensure the safety of electricians, as well as the general public. It's important to note that the NEC is not a federal law, but rather a model code that can be voluntarily adopted and enforced by state and local governments.

Examples of NEC guidelines include:

Article 210.52: Dwelling Unit Receptacle Outlets - This article mandates that all habitable rooms in residential buildings must have an adequate number of electrical outlets, evenly spaced to minimize the use of extension cords and prevent potential hazards.

Article 240.4: Protection of Conductors - This guideline outlines the requirements for overcurrent protection of conductors, including the proper selection of circuit breakers and fuses to prevent electrical fires and equipment damage.

Article 250.66: Grounding Electrode Conductor Sizing - This section of the NEC specifies the minimum sizes for grounding electrode conductors, ensuring that the grounding system can safely carry fault current and minimize the risk of electrical shock or fire.

A dumb model gets 99% acc on 1% prevalence of disease, easily and correctly.

Be careful what you ask for, like acc not f1

Combining leakage, well known datasets, small test data sets, wrong metric ie accuracy on very unbalanced data, a and good data science choices otherwise , is not unexpected to see perfect accuracy. It certainly can be that accurate, but who cares given all these othher possible failings in. The analysis.

It's plausible. To see 100% accuracy esp on well studied datasets or small set of new data. On a 20 example test set in the wild i witnessed exactly this. 20: is super small. The rules forbid me from using more .

A gpt might be engineered to rea papers and report findings of common basic errors in analysis design like you found.

Probability calibration could be added later via telemetry revealing its level of accuracy of its own basic error classification s.

Dnr canal too

Was he quoting in support or against though?

I like to quote Trump. Do you think I support Mango Mussolini now?

Ok but this is pretty much standard procedure in American corporations.

There are so many old buildings across Europe. It's like they found a solution. I have no idea what.

There was a time i was meeting with a new dev and "she" was the focus of his explanations, which were pretty long winded. I didn't get a chance to interrupt his monologue. I was spending too many cycles trying to go back in his words, while he was speaking, to try to determine who she is.

Years later it occurred to me he was being FANCY by calling his code "she" the whole time. I didn't pick up anything meaningful from his text consequently.

It pays to speak plainly.

Your ask is pretty big TBF.

Here's how I would score this passage based on the nine emotions:

Anger: 0 - There's no indication of anger in this statement. Fear: 3 - The passage expresses a sense of worry and concern about the social ramifications of AI that pass as humans, which may reflect some level of fear. Joy: 0 - There's no expression of joy in this statement. Sadness: 0 - There's no indication of sadness in this statement. Disgust: 0 - There's no expression of disgust in this statement. Surprise: 0 - There's no indication of surprise in this statement. Trust: 1 - The passage expresses a concern about a crisis of trust and authenticity in the US, which may reflect some level of trust. Anticipation: 0 - There's no expression of anticipation in this statement. Love: 0 - There's no expression of love in this statement. Please keep in mind that these scores are subjective and based on my interpretation of the text. Different people may score the passage differently based on their own perspectives and interpretations.

Source: chatgpt

Cohere, deepset, ....

Mlops is the datacentric course developed by andrew ng last year. Its at coursera fyi

So now there are at least two. Nice.